MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417280320 · doi:10.2215/cjn.0000000951

Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2025· article· en· W4417280320 on OpenAlexafffund
Vikas S. Sridhar, Luxcia Kugathasan, Yuliya Lytvyn, Hongyan Liu, Yangqing Deng, Leif E. Lovblom, Massimo Nardone, Darren A. Yuen, Yarden Aronson, Mai Mohsen, See Kim, Jacob A. Udell, Bruce A. Perkins, Jasper Stevens, Daan J. Touw, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, David Z.I. Cherney, Sunita Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalMcGill UniversitySt. Michael's HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoWomen's College HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity Health Network Foundation
KeywordsKidney transplantKidneyBlood pressureKidney transplantationRenal functionConfidence intervalRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: The effIcacy, mechaNisms and saFety of SGLT2 INhibitors in kIdney Transplant recIpients trial assessed the physiologic effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients. In kidney transplant recipients, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors lowered mean arterial pressure after 1 week, reduced GFR, increased glucosuria, and were safe. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated in kidney transplant recipients, showing similar cardio-kidney effects seen in other groups; outcome trials in kidney transplant recipients are now needed. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular and kidney protective mechanisms with 12 weeks of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment (dapagliflozin 10 mg daily) were assessed in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with and without type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This randomized double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study enrolled 52 KTR and comprised three sequential physiologic assessments under clamped euglycemia (4-6 mmol/L): baseline, at 1, and 12 weeks of treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate BP lowering with dapagliflozin. Secondary outcomes were iohexol-measured GFR, natriuresis, body composition, noninvasive cardiac output monitoring, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, neurohormones, and safety. RESULTS: Fifty-one KTR completed the study-mean age 53±13 years, 62% with hypertension, 57% with type 2 diabetes, 50% on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and mean eGFR 68.2±24.4 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin did not lower systolic BP at 1 or 12 weeks, although it did reduce mean arterial pressure after 1 week (3.9 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.5 to -0.2). Dapagliflozin led to significant, placebo-adjusted reductions in iohexol-measured GFR from baseline to 1 week (4.2 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, -7.14 to -1.24 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) and 12 weeks (-3.49 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, -6.33 to -0.64). Dapagliflozin significantly increased glucosuria without altering proximal sodium handling or evidence of sympathetic activation. Acute decreases in arterial stiffness (carotid augmentation index, -3.5%; 95% CI, -6.0 to -1.1) were observed in the dapagliflozin group after 12 weeks, although this was not significant compared with placebo. Dapagliflozin was generally safe and well tolerated. No episodes of urinary tract or genitourinary infections were observed in either treatment group throughout the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin activated expected physiologic pathways, although key differences observed in KTR might suggest mechanistic heterogeneity compared with nontransplant populations. Clinical trials evaluating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in KTR are important to determine whether these mechanistic effects translate to improvements in kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04965935 . PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3//www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2026_02_09_KTS_February2026.mp3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→