MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning-Based Receivers for DFT-s-OFDM in Access and Backhaul Communication

2025· article· W4417282859 on OpenAlexaff
Peyman Neshaastegaran, Ming Jian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)MultiplexingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingWirelessPhase noiseFast Fourier transformLimiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discrete Fourier Transform Spread-Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (DFT-s-OFDM) is a promising waveform for both access and backhaul communication in modern wireless systems, due to its low peak-to-average power ratio. However, its performance is impacted by hardware impairments, particularly oscillator phase noise (PN). This paper presents tailored solutions for mitigating PN in DFT-s-OFDM systems, with distinct approaches for the access layer and backhaul communication. For the access layer, we use CoDiPhy, a deep learning (DL)-based receiver that jointly performs channel estimation, equalization, and PN compensation via a conditional denoising diffusion model. As CoDiPhy’s complexity increases with larger FFT and constellation sizes typical in backhaul scenarios, we propose a DL-aided (DLA) PN compensation approach to address the PN issue while reducing computational burden. The DLA PN method outperforms traditional linear interpolation (LI) by exploiting information from all received signals within a pilot section. Simulation results show that CoDiPhy achieves near-optimal performance in the access layer, with coded BERs within 0.2 dB (at a 10<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−6</sup> BER) of the ideal LMMSE solution. In the backhaul scenario, the DLA PN scheme significantly outperforms LI, enabling 1024-QAM with less than 0.5% pilot overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207