MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417288886 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.09039

Microscopic Theory Revealing Ising Criticality with Distinct Sublattice Orders in Pseudospin-1/2 Chain

2025· preprint· W4417288886 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mandev Bhullar, Philip Richard, Hae‐Young Kee

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMicroscopic theoryIsing modelPhase transitionScalingRenormalization groupDegeneracy (biology)Critical exponentHamiltonian (control theory)Critical phenomena

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The one-dimensional transverse Ising model is a paradigmatic example of quantum criticality. In spin-orbit coupled systems, however, effective Ising interactions arise alongside bond-dependent couplings such as Kitaev ($K$) and $Γ$ terms in addition to the Heisenberg ($J$) interaction, leading to complex magnetic orders beyond the pure Ising limit. We first explore how the generic $J-K-Γ$ model with four-fold screw symmetry in a spin-orbit-entangled pseudospin-1/2 chain manifests via sublattice order, and then test whether field-driven transitions retain Ising universality. We find sublattice-dependent magnetic order below the critical field and a distinct sublattice pattern persisting above it. Despite these complex magnetic order structures, the transition remains in the Ising universality class with central charge $c=1/2$. Our work provides a route to the microscopic Hamiltonian and emergent Ising criticality while allowing microscopic physics of the sublattice orders to manifest at low and high fields. Application to antiferromagnetic Ising materials such as BaCo$_2$V$_2$O$_8$ is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207