MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417290170 · doi:10.1111/acer.70208

Levels and patterns of prenatal alcohol exposure associated with increased risk of a clinically meaningful adverse effect on cognitive function

2025· article· en· W4417290170 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph L. Jacobson, Tuğba Akkaya Hocagil, Sandra W. Jacobson, R. Colin Carter, Claire D. Coles, Gale A. Richardson, Heather Carmichael Olson, Nancy L. Day, Neil C. Dodge, Richard J. Cook, Louise Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcohol Clinical and Experimental Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical FrontiersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCognitionAdverse effectPrenatal alcohol exposurePsychological interventionCognitive impairmentWarrant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recent interest in the screening and diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) by the American Psychiatric Association and the American Association of Pediatrics has highlighted the lack of empirical evidence regarding the levels and patterns of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) associated with clinically significant adverse effects on cognitive and behavioral function. We used benchmark dose analysis to address this issue. METHODS: Benchmark dose analyses were performed on composite cognitive function scores derived from data obtained at school age, adolescence, and early adulthood from 2227 participants from six prospective, longitudinal cohorts, whose mothers were interviewed about their alcohol and drug use during pregnancy or shortly thereafter. We compared single-predictor models based on average alcohol consumed per day during pregnancy with a two-predictor, semiparametric model based on (1) average alcohol dose per drinking occasion and (2) drinking frequency. RESULTS: Our two-predictor model showed that at lower levels of drinking frequency, a relatively high dose/occasion is required for an increased risk of poor intellectual function, whereas at higher levels of drinking frequency, a lower dose/occasion is sufficient to increase that risk. In addition, lower doses/occasion were associated with clinically meaningful adverse effects in participants born to older than to younger mothers. The single-predictor models proved less adequate because the dose/occasion for a substantial proportion of participants exposed at the benchmark doses generated by those models was too low to increase the risk of clinically significant effects. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the cognitive and behavioral deficits seen in FASD resemble those also seen in a range of other disorders, whether the patient's PAE is sufficient to increase the risk of clinically meaningful impairment is a critical element in an FASD diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis is needed to determine which patients warrant interventions that have been shown to be effective in remediating PAE-related neurobehavioral impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcohol Clinical and Experimental ResearchSame topicPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFrench-language works237,207