89 Neurodevelopmental outcomes of small for gestational age preterm infants who received deferred cord clamping at birth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background We have shown in a previous national study that deferred cord clamping (DCC) is associated with decreased odds of death or major morbidity compared to early cord clamping (ECC) in small for gestational age (SGA) preterm infants. The impact on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes requires further evaluation. Objectives To compare the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in SGA preterm infants who received DCC with those who received ECC at birth. Design/Methods A national retrospective cohort study of SGA preterm infants <29 weeks’ gestation who were admitted to NICUs participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network database between 2015 and 2020, received DCC (≥ 30 seconds) or ECC (<30 seconds) at birth, and were followed up in Canadian Neonatal Follow Up Network centers at 18-24 months’ corrected gestational age. The primary outcome was any neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) defined as cerebral palsy (CP), score of < 85 in any domain of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (BSITD-III), deafness, or blindness. Secondary outcomes included significant NDI (sNDI) defined as CP with Gross Motor Function Classification System ≥ 3, BSITD-III < 70 in any domain, bilateral blindness, or deafness requiring hearing aids. Multivariable logistic/linear regression models were used to derive adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Results 291 infants were included - Figure 1. Maternal and infant baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. After adjustment for potential confounders on multivariable regression analysis, there was no significant difference in NDI and sNDI between the two groups. However, DCC in SGA infants was associated with decreased odds of mild language impairment (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20,0.72) and moderate to severe motor impairment (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10,0.94). Conclusion In this first national study of neurodevelopmental outcomes of SGA preterm infants after DCC, the odds of NDI was not significantly different from those who received ECC. However, there were associated improvements in the language and motor domains. Further evaluation from large sample size studies is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".