MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417296733 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf116.117

117 The effect of virtual reality game preparation for the management of anxiety in children scheduled for an MRI (IMAGINE): A randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4417296733 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Genest, Pascale Ouimet, Kate St‐Arneault, J Bergeron, Estelle Guingo, Julie Lebeau, Sylvain Deschênes, Stéphane Guay, Nicole Hung, Gabrielle Gilbert, Sylvie Le May

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyRandomized controlled trialVirtual realitySignificant differenceRadiological weaponTreatment and control groups

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background MRIs are known to cause anxiety and fear, especially in paediatric populations, due to claustrophobia and loud noises. This type of radiological examination requires the patient to remain still, but it can be difficult for an anxious child to follow this instruction for an extended period. Few studies have, however, examined the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) in children scheduled for an MRI. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of a VR program, compared to usual care, for the management of procedural-related anxiety and fear in children and adolescents scheduled for an MRI. Design/Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at two paediatric health centres: CHU Sainte-Justine and Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital in Quebec, Canada. Ninety-four (94) children from 6 to 17 years old were randomly assigned to an experimental group (VR preparation program) or a control group (information provided by a radiology technician). Anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Child (STAI-C) and Salivary Alpha-Amylase (SAA-Biomarker for anxiety), and fear, using the Child Fear Scale (CFS), before (T0) and after (T1) the MRI. Child and parental satisfaction were also collected after the MRI (T1). Significance level of 0.05. Results The mean difference of the STAI-C scores (T1-T0) was significantly higher in the experimental group (0.36±2.66) compared to the control group (-0.89±3.33) (p=0.011). There was no significant difference between groups on the CFS at T2 (1.4±0.8 v. 1.3±0.7; p=0.44), nor between groups on the mean difference (T1-T0) of SAA levels (-0.11±0.58 v. 0.20±1.04; p=0.10) respectively. In the experimental group, children and parental levels of satisfaction were respectively 8.43/10 (SD=2.05) and 9.17/10 (SD=1.27). The main comments received were: “VR is an excellent idea”, “I feel like it reduced my child’s and my own anxiety”, and “The game is too juvenile.” Conclusion Results have not shown a superiority of the VR preparation program over the standard procedures for the management of children’s anxiety before an MRI. Nonetheless, high satisfaction levels from both parents and children show an interest in the use of immersive technology to better prepare children for an MRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicPediatric Pain Management Techniques→French-language works237,207→