MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417296772 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf116.101

101 Trends in antenatal risk factors and the cumulative effect on outcomes of very preterm infants in Canada 2010-2023

2025· article· en· W4417296772 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elias Jabbour, Eugene W. Yoon, Karen Wou, Jason Burrows, Amit Mukerji, Prakesh Shah, Marc Beltempo

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversité LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoisson regressionCohort studyPregnancyRisk factorGestationProportional hazards modelRelative riskGestational agePremature birth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Antenatal risk factors such as maternal diabetes, maternal hypertension, maternal age at birth and lower socioeconomic status (income and education) have been increasing over time in high-income countries. Antenatal factors are important contributors to neonatal outcomes of very preterm infants. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the trends in antenatal risk factors and their cumulative effect on the risk of mortality/morbidity in very preterm infants. Design/Methods Retrospective cohort study of infants born 23-31 weeks’ gestation without major congenital anomalies and admitted in the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database 2010-2023. Exposures includes advanced maternal age (AMA), maternal hypertension (HTN), maternal diabetes (DB), and maternal smoking (S). Primary composite outcome was mortality/morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury and necrotizing enterocolitis). The effect of exposure to one, two, three and all four risk factors on the composite outcome was assessed using multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance adjusted for confounders. Results Rate of mortality/morbidity was 40% (16,311/40,952). Overall, rate of exposure to risk factors was: none, 47% (19,366); one, 38% (15,667); two, 12% (4936); three, 2% (929); four 0.1% (54). Compared to not being exposed to any risk factors, significantly higher risk of mortality/morbidity was observed with exposure to one (adjusted RR [aRR] 1.94, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) and two risk factors (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.68-0.96) but not with three (aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.11) and four (aRR 1.27, 95% CI 0.89-1.81). Maternal HTN (alone and in combination with other factors) was the most consistent risk factor for adverse outcomes. The proportion of neonates exposed ≥1 risk factor increased from 50% in 2010 to 55% in 2023. Conclusion The proportion of very preterm infants exposed to antenatal risk factors is increasing over time and exposure to a higher number of risk factors is associated with higher risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. This can help identify antenatal and postnatal interventions to mediate the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207