MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417296796 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaf116.038

38 High prevalence of fractures and pain in children with medical complexity cohort

2025· article· en· W4417296796 on OpenAlexaff
J. Verbeke, Mélissa Fiscaletti

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortIncidence (geometry)Cerebral palsyOsteoporosisBone mineralCohort studyBone densityProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Children with Medical Complexity (CMC) are at high risk of sustaining fragility fractures due to low bone mineral density (BMD). These patients are exposed to multiple factors like limited mobility, feeding difficulties and medication that impair bone density gain. Pain or discomfort are currently reported by their caregiver, due to many conditions. Among them, fragility fractures are a frequent cause of acute and chronic pain, but are often underdiagnosed and could be prevented. Children with cerebral palsy have an annual fracture incidence double that of typically developing children. An individual’s risk for osteoporosis can be monitored by measuring BMD and identifying other clinical risk factors (such as ancestry, age, sex, pubertal stage, medication). Objectives We collected datas on a cohort of CMC recruited for a project in progress about the association between a polygenic risk score and variance of BMD. By presenting these datas, our objective is to prove high prevalence of fragility fractures and subsequently pain in a high-risk population, where robust data on bone health are lacking Design/Methods We conduct a single-center prospective cohort study in which we recruit children aged 1 to 18 years diagnosed with either cerebral palsy or Duchenne muscular dystrophy plus medical complexity. Recruitment is conducted by a research nurse, with physical examination performed by paediatricians. Medical history includes fracture occurrence and pain. Participants undergo spinal X-rays and DXA scans to evaluate vertebral fractures and BMD. All study visits align with participants’ regular hospital appointments. Results Sixty-nine participants have been successfully recruited into our study. Median age is 7.5 years [1-17¬]. The results reveal low BMD z-scores in spine (median -1.8 [-7.1 – 1.6]) and severely low hip BMD z-scores (median -3.5 [-5.2 – 2.3]), a high prevalence of fracture (29%) and reported pain (60%). Fractures occur more often in long bones, while pain is usually reported in the back. 41% have scoliosis. Many of them are exposed to anti-epileptic therapy (50%) or ketogenic diet (11.5%). Some are already treated for OP (33% receive bisphosphonates). Conclusion Our data prove a high prevalence of fractures and reported pain in this high-risk population, which could be prevented by screening them for fragility fractures and low-BMD. Developing targeted prevention strategies for bone health in children requires more robust data in this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→French-language works237,207→