Pruritus and health-related quality of life in chronic liver disease: a longitudinal, survey-based cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cholestatic pruritus is commonly reported in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); however, information on pruritus in other chronic liver diseases (CLDs) is limited. This survey-based cohort study characterised the severity, persistence and impact of pruritus in PBC, PSC, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection (HBV/HCV), drug-induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Here, we focus on groups that recruited the most participants: PSC, MASH and HCV. Results are presented in the context of PBC. METHODS: Adults with a CLD of interest from the USA, the UK, Canada and Germany were screened for the presence of pruritus via the worst-itch numerical rating scale (WI-NRS, 3-month recall) between January 2021 and January 2022. Enrolled participants (single liver disease, non-transplant recipients) self-reporting pruritus with no extrahepatic causes in the past 3 months (WI-NRS≥1) were eligible for further health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) assessments, including WI-NRS (2-week recall), 5-dimensional itch scale and version two of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (month 0), month 3 and month 6. RESULTS: Of 717 screened participants, 40.4% (AIH)-72.7% (HCV) reported any pruritus. Of 403 eligible participants, 357 were enrolled. Time since onset of pruritus to enrolment ranged from 28.0 (MASH) to 77.5 months (PBC). Baseline WI-NRS scores ranged from 3.8 (MASH) to 5.1 (PSC). The most selected terms used to describe pruritus across all CLDs were 'deep itch' and 'urgent itch' (range: 53.7% (HCV)-77.0% (PSC)). Participants with more severe pruritus had worse HRQoL. Intimate relationships, emotional well-being and ability to concentrate were negatively impacted by pruritus. Pruritus persisted over the 6-month study period across all CLDs. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the burden of pruritus experienced by participants across CLDs, highlighting a need to improve symptom recognition and treatments focused on improving HRQoL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".