MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417299072 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108730

Enhanced grid-current feedback active damping for LCL grid connected inverter using discretized band-pass filter with full delay compensation

2025· article· en· W4417299072 on OpenAlexaff
Youssef Lamkharbach, J. Cros, Ahmed Chebak

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)DiscretizationCompensation (psychology)Filter (signal processing)Nyquist frequencyNoise (video)Nyquist stability criterionBlock (permutation group theory)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Grid Current Feedback Active Damping (GCF-AD) strategies based on high-pass filter HPF -either first order (FO) or second order (SO)- are widely used to suppress resonance in LCL grid-connected inverters. However, these methods suffer from high-frequency noise sensitivity due to their respective slopes of +20 dB/decade and +40 dB/decade. To address this limitation, a Band-Pass Filter (BPF) is proposed as the active damping feedback function. When discretized using the Tustin pre-warping method, the BPF introduces a negative gain near the Nyquist frequency, effectively attenuating high-frequency noise amplification. Nevertheless, the digital implementation of the BPF restricts the range of positive virtual resistance, and therefore the effective damping range to approximately ( the sampling frequency). To overcome this limitation, a delay compensation block based on a Modified First-Order Digital Filter (MFODF) is cascaded with the BPF. The analysis demonstrates that this compensation significantly expands the effective damping range, reaching up to , and contributes to improved closed-loop system stability. Furthermore, a comprehensive z-domain stability analysis of the closed-loop is conducted to evaluate the impact of key control parameters. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through laboratory experiments, confirming the improvements in both damping performance and closed-loop system stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207