MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417304377 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.10.076

1-Year Outcomes of Novel Balloon-Expandable vs Contemporary Transcatheter Heart Valves in Severe Aortic Stenosis

2025· article· en· W4417304377 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrick Serruys, Akihiro Tobe, Niels van Royen, Ignacio J. Amat‐Santos, Martin Hudec, Matjaž Bunc, Ben J L Van den Branden, Peep Laanmets, Daniel Unić, Béla Merkely, Renicus S. Hermanides, Vlasis Ninios, Marcin Protasiewicz, Benno J. Rensing, Pedro Martín, Fausto Feres, Manuel Almeida, Eric Van Belle, Axel Linke, Alfonso Ielasi, Matteo Montorfano, Mark Webster, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Emmanuel Teíger, Francesco Bedogni, Michiel Voskuil, Manuel Pan, Oskar Angerås, Jürgen Rothe, Mohamed Abdel Wahab, Ivica Kristić, Vicente Peral, Scot Garg, Tsung‐Ying Tsai, Ashokkumar Thakkar, Udita Chandra, Pieter C. Smits, Marie‐Claude Morice, Yoshinobu Onuma, Andreas Baumbach

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHellenic Society of CardiologyAbbott VascularMicroPortCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaAbiomedDaiichi-SankyoJenaValveBoston Scientific CorporationEdwards LifesciencesAmgenVifor PharmaPfizerAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsStenosisHemodynamicsAortic valve stenosisAortic valveRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In the LANDMARK trial, the Myval balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) series was noninferior to the most commonly used contemporary SAPIEN and Evolut Series THVs for the 30-day early safety endpoint in participants with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: The current report from the LANDMARK trial describes clinical outcomes, hemodynamic performances, and quality of life at 1 year. METHODS: This open-label, noninferiority trial enrolled 768 participants across 31 hospitals in Europe, New Zealand, and Brazil. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a Myval THV series or a contemporary THV (SAPIEN or Evolut series). The composite endpoint at 1 year included all-cause mortality, all strokes, and procedure- or valve-related hospitalizations. Clinical efficacy was defined as freedom from the composite endpoint. As recommended in Valve Academic Research Consortium-3, the previous composite endpoint combined with the assessment of quality of life at baseline and 1 year with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey was reported as an extended composite endpoint. The noninferiority hypothesis was prespecified for the assessment of the primary endpoint at 30 days. Considering the specific 1-year composite endpoints of Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 and the event rate of 27.23% derived from recent studies, an a posteriori descriptive and exploratory noninferiority hypothesis was introduced with a noninferiority margin of 10.89%. The analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: < 0.0001). Similarly, there were no significant differences in freedom from the extended composite endpoint (80.5% vs 77.3%; difference: 3.2%; 95% CI: -2.9% to 9.2%; P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis, the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of the Myval THV series were comparable to those of contemporary THVs for the 1-year composite of all-cause mortality, all strokes, or procedure- or valve-related hospitalizations. (LANDMARK Trial: a Randomised Controlled Trial of Myval THV [LANDMARK]; NCT04275726).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of Cardiology→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→