MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417305734 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2025.080402

Adaptive Inspection Path Planning Algorithm for Oil Pipeline Robots Driven by Fluid Kinetic Energy

2025· article· W4417305734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)AdaptabilityPipeline transportRobotReliability (semiconductor)TrajectoryEnergy consumptionEnergy (signal processing)Motion planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipelines are the core infrastructure for energy transportation, but their long-distance service and complex internal environment, such as fluid eddies, bends, branches, and sediments, pose significant challenges to the reliability and efficiency of pipeline testing. The traditional pipeline testing methods (manual testing and fixed sensor monitoring) provide low coverage, high labor costs, and adaptability to harsh environments. Although liquid driven pipeline robots do not require external power and are suitable for remote data collection, existing trajectory planning algorithms have not fully considered the dynamic characteristics of the flow field and the complexity of pipeline structures, resulting in high energy consumption, lack of recognition coverage, and poor trajectory adaptability. To address the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes an adaptive recognition route planning algorithm for liquid powered pipeline robots. The experimental results show that the algorithm has good dynamic adaptability, with a coverage rate always above 98% and energy consumption mostly below 80J, effectively improving the adaptability and recognition of liquid powered robots in complex environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207