The <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> Ku C-terminus orchestrates LigD activity through domain-specific interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bacterial non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is a DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway that relies on the Ku–LigD complex to alleviate genomic instability. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku C-terminus has been highlighted for its role in LigD recruitment to DNA DSBs and stimulation of ligase activity. However, it remains unclear how the Ku C-terminus interacts with and potentially influences other LigD activities. Here, we combine NMR spectroscopy, structural modelling and mutational analysis to define the interaction interface between the Ku C-terminus and LigD. We identify critical residues in Ku (E246, V248, S258, K260, and N266) and the LigD polymerase (D162, V194, R198) and ligase (D522, K579, L580) domains that mediate this interaction. Functional assays reveal that Ku stimulates LigD ligase activity through contacts with both polymerase and ligase domains, while Ku attenuates template-dependent polymerase activity, contrasting previous studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa homologs. Disrupting the Ku–LigD interface, either through Ku or LigD mutations, abolishes ligase stimulation and restores polymerase activity, highlighting a dual regulatory mechanism. Our data supports a model where Ku’s C-terminal region forms a bipartite interface with LigD to balance repair activity. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the Ku–LigD repair mechanism and uncovers species-specific differences in bacterial NHEJ. Graphical Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".