Evaluating bioaccumulation potential of cyclic and linear volatile methylsiloxanes in aquatic and terrestrial species: a comprehensive analysis using the Bioaccumulation Assessment Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comprehensive analysis of the bioaccumulation of three cyclic (namely, D4, D5, and D6) and five linear (namely, L2, L3, L4, L5, and L6) volatile methylsiloxanes (VMS) in biota was conducted by reviewing 50 published articles and laboratory reports on aquatic (82%) and terrestrial (18%) species. A total of 178 bioaccumulation values were evaluated employing a quantitative weight-of-evidence (qWoE) approach provided by the Bioaccumulation Assessment Tool. Considerable variability of bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) values was observed for VMS in aquatic organisms, which ranged from below to above their respective regulatory threshold values. The frequency of evidence for nonbioaccumulation (i.e., BCF or BAF <2,000) was ≥50% for D6, L2, L5, and L6. Conversely, laboratory biomagnification factor (BMF) values were generally ≥71% less than 1, indicating low bioaccumulation potential through dietary uptake. Field BMFs displayed more variability but still suggested a low bioaccumulation potential. Despite the majority (≥65%) of trophic magnification factors (TMFs) in aquatic food webs being below 1, the broad range of TMF values for all VMS examined indicates potential uncertainties introduced by environmental factors in the target environments (e.g., chemical exposure gradient) and sampling bias. Overall, lines of evidence (≥71%) suggest that cyclic and linear VMS generally do not bioaccumulate in aquatic species, with dietary uptake being the primary pathway. For terrestrial species, primarily rats, predicted and field BMFs were less than 1 at 37 °C, primarily via respiratory elimination. Field TMFs for terrestrial food webs, including invertebrates and various bird species with body temperatures of 18 and 40 °C, respectively, were sourced from a single study, where D4 demonstrated trophic dilution, while D5 and D6 generally did not biomagnify in this terrestrial food web.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".