MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417313957 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2025.080404

NF-Net: Crowd Counting Based on Near-Far Network and Dynamic Dual Attention Mechanism

2025· article· W4417313957 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research ProjectHenan University
KeywordsDiscriminative modelKey (lock)Dual (grammatical number)Noise (video)Perspective (graphical)Curse of dimensionalityFusion mechanismFeature extractionFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crowd counting and precise localization in dense scenes are critical tasks in computer vision. Although the point-based prediction framework P2PNet eliminates complex post-processing steps through ensemble prediction, it still faces challenges such as insufficient multi-scale feature extraction and limited ability to perceive key information in complex scenes. To address these issues, this paper improves P2PNet by proposing a model based on a far-near network and a dynamic dual attention mechanism. Specifically, it introduces a far-near adaptive network (FN-Net) and a dynamic dual attention mechanism (DDAM). FN-Net explicitly models continuous scale variations caused by perspective effects by dividing the image into regions based on spatial position and assigning differentiated receptive fields. DDAM focuses on crowded areas through parallel spatial attention and channel attention sub-modules, selects discriminative features, and integrates a dynamic weighted fusion mechanism to adaptively combine the advantages of both attentions. Experiments show that our approach effectively enhances key features while suppressing background noise thus improves crowd counting accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207