MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417317229 · doi:10.1103/bzqh-2w3l

Analytically tractable zoo of similarity-induced exceptional structures

2025· article· en· W4417317229 on OpenAlexafffund
Anton Montag, Jordan Isaacs, Marcus Stålhammar, Flore K. Kunst

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersEuropean Research CouncilVetenskapsrådetMax-Planck-GesellschaftEuropean CommissionUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceDimension (graph theory)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsCoalescence (physics)Connection (principal bundle)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exceptional points (EPs) are non-Hermitian spectral degeneracies marking a simultaneous coalescence of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Despite the fact that multiband <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mi>n</a:mi> </a:math> -fold EPs ( <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>EP</b:mi> <b:mi>n</b:mi> <b:mi mathvariant="normal">s</b:mi> </b:mrow> </b:math> ) generically emerge as special points on manifolds of <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mi>EP</d:mi> <d:mi>m</d:mi> <d:mi mathvariant="normal">s</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:math> , where <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mrow> <f:mi>m</f:mi> <f:mo>&lt;</f:mo> <f:mi>n</f:mi> </f:mrow> </f:math> , <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:mi>EP</g:mi> <g:mi>n</g:mi> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">s</g:mi> </g:mrow> </g:math> as well as their topological properties have hitherto been studied as isolated objects. In this work, we address this issue and carefully map out the emerging properties of multifold exceptional structures in three and four dimensions under the influence of one or multiple generalized similarities, revealing diverse combinations of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mi>EP</i:mi> <i:mi>m</i:mi> <i:mi mathvariant="normal">s</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:math> in direct connection to <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <k:mrow> <k:mi>EP</k:mi> <k:mi>n</k:mi> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">s</k:mi> </k:mrow> </k:math> . We find that simply counting the number of constraints defining the <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>EP</m:mi> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> is not sufficient in the presence of similarities; the constraints can also be satisfied by the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <o:mrow> <o:mi>EP</o:mi> <o:mi>m</o:mi> </o:mrow> </o:math> manifolds obeying certain spectral symmetries in the complex eigenvalue plane, reducing their dimension beyond what is expected from counting the number of constraints. Furthermore, the in- duced spectral symmetries not always allow for any <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <p:mrow> <p:mi>EP</p:mi> <p:mi>m</p:mi> </p:mrow> </p:math> manifold to emerge in <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <q:mi>n</q:mi> </q:math> -band systems, making the plethora of exceptional structures deviate further from naive expectations. We illustrate our findings in simple periodic toy models. By relying on similarity relations instead of the less general symmetries, we simultaneously cover several physically relevant scenarios, ranging from optics and topolectrical circuits to open quantum systems. This makes our predictions highly relevant and broadly applicable in modern research, as well as experimentally viable within various branches of physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.310
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicGeometry and complex manifoldsFrench-language works237,207