Plutarco y el Triunfo de Paulo Emilio en el arte italiano del Renacimiento. Primera parte: Siglo XV y Roma del XVI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uno de los textos más afortunados que nos ha dejado Plutarco en sus biografías es la écfrasis del desfile triunfal de Paulo Emilio tras su victoria sobre Perseo de Macedonia en Pidna. Igual que en el caso de otros triunfos, inició su ingreso en la cultura occidental con su inclusión, como carta de presentación, entre los triunfos de Petrarca y Boccaccio y en los códices que resumían la historia romana. Su riqueza descriptiva atrajo la atención artística de los gobernantes y comerciantes de las repúblicas italianas y de las autoridades eclesiásticas que decoraron con el triunfo completo, tal como lo describe Plutarco (Aem. 32-34), o con escenas aisladas seleccionadas en función de los intereses del comitente, distintos soportes materiales de los siglos XV y XVI, o sea, de todo el renacimiento italiano. En esta Primera parte del artículo presento y discuto (teniendo siempre como texto de referencia la Vida de Emilio de Plutarco) su iconografía en los arcones de novia y grabados del Quattrocento y, especialmente, en los frescos de salones y fachadas de los palacios de Roma en el Cinquecento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".