MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417324956 · doi:10.5194/ica-abs-10-139-2025

Location-Based Services in Complex Indoor Environments via Modern Smartphone Multi-Sensor Integrated Navigation

2025· article· en· W4417324956 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Mahdi Kariminejad, Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi, Mohammad Sharifi, Alireza Amiri-Simkooei

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCentre de Géomatique du Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKey (lock)Global Positioning SystemField (mathematics)Mobile deviceBluetooth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of location-based services (LBS) in indoor environments, such as shopping malls, airports, and other large and complex buildings, has increasingly become more attractive.LBS are a type of service that utilizes the geographical location of a user or device to provide relevant information or functionality to that specific location or point of interest [Huang et al. (2018)].These services typically rely on technologies such as Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), which are usually inefficient in indoor environments, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or Wireless Sensor Networks to determine the user's position in real-time.Nowadays, modern smartphones are equipped with many useful sensors, some of which are particularly important for mapping, positioning, and navigation in indoor environments [Zhuang et al. (2016), Al-Balasmeh et al. (2024)].Recently, researchers have concentrated on enhancing the precision of positioning and navigation outputs through the integration of these sensors.The sensors used for integrated navigation are listed in the following, based on the type of measurement they provide.The first category is radio-based sensors that measure geometric quantities, such as distance or angle, either directly or indirectly.This includes GNSS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, including Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and, more recently, Ultra-Wideband (UWB).The second category is Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), which measure physical quantities such as linear acceleration and angular velocity using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) accelerometers and gyroscopes, all within the smartphone's body frame.Finally, other sensors, such as the magnetometer (or magnetic compass), barometer, cameras, and pedometer, can also be used to determine location parameters through integrated navigation algorithms.For example, some useful Android and iOS applications collect this data simultaneously, allowing users to integrate it for LBS approaches.In this research, we introduce several of these applications based on the types of measurements, as shown in Table 1.App Android iOS Bluetooth Wi-Fi IMUs Magnetometer Barometer Pedometer Visual Sensor Logger Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes phyphox Yes Yes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts of the ICASame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207