MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417326867 · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02965-z

Accelerating sea level rise in Africa and its large marine ecosystems since the 1990s

2025· article· en· W4417326867 on OpenAlexafffund
Franck Eitel Kemgang Ghomsi, Julienne Strœve, Antonio Bonaduce, Roshin P. Raj

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersBjerknessenteret for klimaforskning, Universitetet i BergenCanada Research ChairsEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsClimate changeMarine ecosystemEcosystemSea levelGlobal warmingSea level riseSea iceGlobal changeEffects of global warming on oceans

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sea-level rise poses a significant threat to Africa’s vital coastal ecosystems and the livelihoods of its growing populations. Here we analyze 31 years of satellite altimetry data to quantify sea-level change across Africa’s Large Marine Ecosystems, vast ocean regions of high biological productivity. The rate of rise has accelerated markedly to 4.34 mm/yr since 2010, over four times the 1990s rate. This is primarily driven by two factors: an increase in ocean mass from melting ice sheets accounts for over 80% of the total rise, with the remainder reflecting the expansion of warming ocean water. Regional rates are fastest in the Red Sea and Guinea Current, while increased salinity suppresses the trend in the Mediterranean. 2023 was particularly severe, with record-high sea levels across nearly 40% of Africa’s surrounding ocean. This uneven rise intensifies risks for over 50 million coastal residents, underscoring the urgent need for region-specific adaptation. Sea-level rise in African large marine ecosystem has accelerated markedly since 2010, mostly due to ice sheet loss and land subsidence, with the Red Sea and Guinea Current rising fastest, according to an analysis of 30 years of satellite altimetry data

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207