MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417333366 · doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1251_25

Bruxism, Sleep Quality, Anxiety Disorders, and Tension-Type Headache in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W4417333366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aditya Dupare, Mukta Motwani, Aarati Panchbhai, Vidyarjan Sukhadeve, Charwak Tayade, Snehal Vijay Bhalerao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyTemporomandibular jointSleep (system call)Sleep BruxismJoint painSleep disorderTemporomandibular Joint DisorderMyofascial pain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A BSTRACT Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) involve pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint and associated muscles. Emerging evidence suggests associations with bruxism, poor sleep quality, anxiety disorders, and tension-type headache (TTH). To systematically review the associations between bruxism, sleep quality, anxiety disorders, and TTH in patients with TMD. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 2025. Studies included adults with TMD and reported associations with bruxism, sleep quality, anxiety, or TTH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were narratively synthesized. Twenty-six studies were included. Bruxism prevalence ranged from 45% to 87% in TMD patients, with significant associations with myofascial pain ( P < 0.05). Poor sleep quality was reported in 40–75% of TMD patients and correlated with pain severity. Anxiety disorders were present in 30–60% of TMD patients, often exacerbating pain perception. TTH coexisted in 25–65% of TMD patients, sharing central sensitization as a mechanism. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. Bruxism, poor sleep quality, anxiety disorders, and TTH frequently coexist with TMD. Multidisciplinary assessment is crucial. Future longitudinal studies are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy And Bioallied SciencesSame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207