MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leveraging AI for Security and Compliance in Cloud-Native and Service-Oriented Architectures: A Framework Approach

2025· article· W4417339291 on OpenAlexaff
Nadine Y. Fares, Manar Jammal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentKey (lock)Compliance (psychology)Face (sociological concept)Security information and event managementSecurity service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing adoption of cloud-native and serviceoriented architectures (SOA) in modern enterprise systems introduces significant security and compliance challenges. These environments, characterized by their dynamic scaling, distributed services, and complex attack surfaces, necessitate innovative solutions to ensure robust protection and regulatory adherence. As organizations migrate to these architectures, they face an array of cybersecurity threats that require proactive and effective responses. This paper explores the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enhance security and compliance in cloud-native and SOA ecosystems. It proposes a structured framework that integrates AI for real-time threat detection, adaptive defense, and automated compliance monitoring. This framework effectively addresses key security risks, such as dynamic workloads, cross-border data flows, and the growing complexity of regulatory requirements. Furthermore, it emphasizes maintaining legal and ethical standards through principles of AI transparency, fairness, and privacy-by-design, ensuring responsible AI deployment in these evolving environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207