MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417339587 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0013833

Detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato microRNAs in cystic echinococcosis patients: An exploratory study using quantitative PCR and digital PCR

2025· article· en· W4417339587 on OpenAlexaff
Chiara Stocchero, Tommaso Manciulli, A. Zanon, Stefania Sechi, Alessia Pea, Alessandra Cafiso, Paola Pepe, Ambra Vola, Marcela Cucher, Enrico Brunetti, Cristina Lecchi, Chiara Bazzocchi

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic infections in humans and animals
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEchinococcus granulosusDigital polymerase chain reactionCystic echinococcosisSensuEchinococcosisReal-time polymerase chain reactionmicroRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a zoonosis caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.). The adult parasite typically resides in the intestine of canids, while the larval stage, a fluid-filled cyst, primarily resides in the liver and lungs of ungulates and humans. The diagnosis of abdominal CE in humans is mainly based on ultrasound (US) complemented by serology, but both techniques present limitations. Therefore, new diagnostic methods are needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are potential suitable biomarkers for parasitic diseases, as well as for the diagnosis and cyst staging of CE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of three E. granulosus s.l. miRNAs (egr-let-7-5p, egr-miR-10a-5p, and egr-miR-71-5p) in the serum of CE patients using novel TaqMan-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) assays. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Serum samples from 25 patients with CE, 10 patients with non-CE hepatic lesions, and 10 patients with other parasitic infections were collected. In addition, four cyst fluids were also obtained. Total small RNAs were extracted, reverse-transcribed into cDNA, and amplified. Echinococcus granulosus s.l. miRNAs were detected by qPCR and dPCR in cyst fluid samples, and by dPCR in serum samples. In detail, egr-let-7-5p, egr-miR-10a-5p, and egr-miR-71-5p were amplified in 52%, 48%, and 36% of CE samples, respectively (range: 0.20- 2.86 copies/µL). No egr-miRNAs were detected in patients with non-CE hepatic lesions, whereas egr-miR-71-5p was amplified in only one Schistosoma spp. patient. In association with US for CE diagnosis, dPCR assay showed the highest performance when a single E. granulosus s.l. miRNA was amplified, achieving a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 63.9-95.5) and specificity of 95% (95% CI 75.0-99.9). Increasing the number of positive miRNAs required for a positive result reduced sensitivity substantially (40% with two miRNAs, 95% CI 21.1-61.3; 12% with three miRNAs, 95% CI 2.5-31.2). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although this study's explorative nature and the limited sample size, the detection of E. granulosus s.l. miRNAs in the serum of CE patients proved feasible, potentially supporting the medical decision-making process in association with US for CE diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS neglected tropical diseasesSame topicParasitic infections in humans and animalsFrench-language works237,207