MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417339889 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00271

Supraspinatus Slide and Puttiectomy to Manage Shoulder Abduction Contracture Due to Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

2025· article· en· W4417339889 on OpenAlex
Eleftheria Samara, Andrea Chan, Sonia Chaudhry, Brant Sachleben, Alison Anthony, Chris Delayun, Emily S. Ho, Howard M. Clarke, Kristen M. Davidge, Sevan Hopyan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Open Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContractureScapulaBrachial plexusBrachial plexus injuryReduction (mathematics)Rotator cuffMuscle contractureShoulder surgeryShoulder joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Shoulder abduction contracture is present in a high proportion of children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). An esthetic concern that at least some patients with this condition express is prominence of the superomedial scapular angle (Putti sign). Surgical reduction of the glenohumeral joint to improve internal rotation contracture may worsen abduction contracture. The aims of this study were to document that worsening and to test whether supraspinatus slide can decrease abduction contracture without unacceptably weakening shoulder abduction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of BPBI patients with Waters grade III to V glenohumeral dysplasia who underwent supraspinatus slide with or without resection of the prominent superomedial angle of the scapula (“Puttiectomy”) as adjuncts of combined subscapularis slide, open glenohumeral reduction, glenoid anteversion osteotomy, and tendon transfers. Abduction contracture was defined as the brachiothoracic angle with the shoulder in maximal passive adduction measured using a goniometer. Measurements were taken preoperatively, after glenohumeral reduction and after supraspinatus slide. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine mean differences at preoperative, postreduction, and postsupraspinatus slide periods. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age at surgery was 9.0 years (SE = 0.8 y) and the preoperative distribution of Waters classification was the following: Type III in 5 patients (19%), Type IV in 6 (22%), and Type V in 16 (59%). Intraoperative reduction of the glenohumeral joint immediately worsened abduction contracture from a preoperative mean of 27° (SE = 17) to 51° (SE = 20, p < 0.0001). Supraspinatus slide improved the abduction contracture to 20° (SE = 14, p < 0.001). In 22 patients (82%), a subjective decision to improve cosmesis by Puttiectomy was made despite the contracture improvement. Active abduction remained stable before (161° ±30°) and after (160° ±29°, p = 0.9) surgery. Conclusions: Abduction contracture associated with glenohumeral dysplasia worsens with joint reduction. Supraspinatus slide can mitigate worsening of abduction contracture to near-baseline severity without diminishing shoulder abduction power. Level of Evidence: Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it