Contributions of nonhuman primate research to unraveling the social brain and its impairments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of human life depends in particular on the richness of social interactions. These interactions are made possible through the recognition and understanding of social signals and their conventions. This understanding is supported by social cognitive skills, which are recognized as one of the core functional domains that can be affected in neuropsychiatric, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Disturbances of social cognition include impaired social perception, ineffective theory of mind, reduced empathy, or abnormal social behavior. From social perception to social cognition, all the way to social behaviors: research in non-human primate has been uniquely contributing towards identifying the neurobiological bases of social processes. In this review we highlight the relevance of these findings to our understanding of the workings of the social brain, with the goal of laying the foundation for developing better models of these impairments in patients and supplying human clinical neuroscience with valuable new hypotheses to understand how social mechanisms and access to them are disturbed in disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".