MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417347120 · doi:10.21083/caree.v1i1.8919

Addressing Information Disorder on Climate-Smart Agriculture: Rethinking Advisory and Extension Services for Sustainable Rural Development in Nigeria

2025· article· W4417347120 on OpenAlex
Kehinde Oladeji

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Agri-food & Rural Advisory Extension and Education Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural extensionCredibilityCitizen journalismFocus groupSustainable developmentInformation and Communications TechnologyExtension (predicate logic)Information needsAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The usefulness of Climate Smart Agriculture is becoming very important in making the agri-food sector stronger and more sustainable in the midst of climate change. Although Nigerian farmers are adopting CSA practices, the adoption is hindered by information disorder, which encompasses misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation. This can alter the access to information available to farmers in the region, weaken extension officers’ advisory efforts, and lead to a reduction in trust in the adoption of innovations in farming. This study, therefore, explores how information disorder affects CSA communication in Oyo State, Nigeria, and also looks into different strategies for transforming agricultural extension efforts with a focus on extant Extension 4.0. This study utilized a mixed method of research by combining survey data and interview responses from smallholder farmers, extension officers, and agricultural communication experts. SPSS and NVivo were used to analyze data and identify patterns as well as comments from respondents. Findings show that social media, farmers' groups, and unverified digital content were the major sources of information. It was revealed that these sources contributed to doubt of farmers towards CSA messages and increased the credibility gap between farmers and extension officers. Moreover, the study emphasized major challenges such as low digital literacy, insufficient regulatory oversight critical challenges such as low digital literacy, weak regulatory oversight, and limited participatory mechanisms in the current extension framework. Lessons were also drawn from Canadian advisory models with comparative ideas on cross-sectoral collaboration and media literacy integration. The study concluded that combating information disorder requires a reimagination of local communication systems. This entails the incorporation of digital knowledge and advisory strategies that are community-driven and evidence-based.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it