Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Studies of queer temporality, both in Scottish literature and more generally, have emphasised the importance of non-linear time and questions of futurity. Scottish texts of the 1920s, however, present a different view, where the rejection of compulsory heterosexuality, at the very least, is historically situated. J. M. Barrie's Mary Rose (1920) juxtaposes multiple timelines to suggest the possibility of rejecting traditional family and gender relations, while Compton Mackenzie's two portraits of queer life on Capri, Vestal Fire (1927) and Extraordinary Women (1928), present the international community there as located firmly in the past. Both authors specifically posit islands, real or fictional, as places of transformation and exploration. Islands not only have their own time, but a unique relation to questions of sexuality. While Barrie and Mackenzie's texts, when discussed at all, are seen as fundamentally conservative and predominantly read in relation to the authors' biographies, this article suggests that their overlooked status in current conversations about queer literature and history is itself productive. In both geographic and historical setting the works emphasise peripherality and non-integration. They are, following Lauren Berlant's recent work, inconvenient texts, and texts about inconvenience. Taking such texts seriously, and emphasising the value of literature, and lives, that remain outliers, demonstrates new interpretive possibilities for the study of queer Scottish literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".