Eltrombopag in Treating Post‐Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Cytopenias: Efficacy, Response Durability, and Cost Benefit of Early Drug Tapering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of eltrombopag (EPAG) in the management of post allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) cytopenia has exhibited promising outcomes. Isolated thrombocytopenia and poor graft function (PGF) are factors that adversely influence transplant outcomes and patient well-being. This retrospective study aims to assess EPAG efficacy in this context as a primary outcome and evaluate early EPAG tapering post complete response (CR) for cost efficiency and response durability as a secondary outcome. We analyzed 39 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT; EPAG was administered to 89.7% of patients for PGF and 10.3% for isolated thrombocytopenia. The overall response rate (ORR) after 4 weeks of EPAG treatment was 71.8%, with 48.7% achieving a complete response (CR). Early tapering of EPAG post-CR was explored for cost benefit among responders. Early tapering was defined as the start of tapering after 4 weeks of achieving CR and was found to be associated with significant response durability with a trend towards cost effectiveness. Eltrombopag response was independent of megakaryocyte number or density prior to drug initiation. The study suggests EPAG as a safe treatment for PGF and isolated thrombocytopenia post-allogeneic HCT and proposes early drug tapering as a potentially cost-beneficial approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".