Linking Age Changes in Human Cortical Microcircuits to Impaired Brain Function and <scp>EEG</scp> Biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human brain aging involves a variety of cellular and synaptic changes, but how these changes affect brain function and signals remains poorly understood due to experimental limitations in humans, meriting the use of detailed computational models. We identified key human cellular and synaptic changes occurring with age from previous studies, including a loss of inhibitory cells, NMDA receptors, and spines. We integrated these changes into our detailed human cortical microcircuit models and simulated activity in middle age (~50 years) and older (~70 years) microcircuits, and linked the altered mechanisms to reduced spike rates and impaired signal detection. We then simulated EEG potentials arising from the microcircuit activity and found that the emergent power spectral changes due to these aging cellular mechanisms reproduced most of the resting-state EEG biomarkers seen in human aging, including reduced aperiodic offset, exponent, and periodic peak center frequency. Using machine learning, we demonstrated that the changes to the cellular and synaptic aging mechanisms can be estimated accurately from the simulated EEG aging biomarkers. Our results link cellular and synaptic mechanisms of aging with impaired cortical function and physiological biomarkers in clinically relevant brain signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".