A partial taxonomic revision of Atelopus (Anura: Bufonidae) from the central and eastern Andes of Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harlequin toads, genus Atelopus, are a species-rich group of Neotropical anurans. Unparalleled declines and extinctions have hampered a thorough understanding of Atelopus systematics with numerous species only known from few specimens and a single or few localities. Major knowledge gaps particularly remain in the Cordillera Central and Cordillera Oriental of the Colombian Andes. In the central Andes, the names Atelopus angelito, A. ebenoides, and A. eusebianus have caused taxonomic confusion because populations can show vast plasticity, and populations assigned to these names were thought to occur in sympatry and parapatry. The virtual disappearance of all populations has prevented an integrative taxonomic assessment and rendered molecular approaches highly challenging. Based on adult and larval morphology, we propose that these populations correspond to a single polymorphic taxon and establish A. ebenoides as the senior synonym. In contrast, a form from the northern Cordillera Oriental has been considered a subspecies of the latter, A. ebenoides marinkellei. These geographically highly distant populations differ in morphology, particularly in tadpole characters and do not appear to represent conspecifics. We therefore elevate the form marinkellei to species rank and provide detailed morphological redescriptions and tadpole accounts for both A. ebenoides and A. marinkellei.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".