Algorithm 1060: EDOLAB, a Platform for Research and Education in Evolutionary Dynamic Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many real-world optimization problems exhibit dynamic characteristics, posing significant challenges for traditional optimization methods. Evolutionary Dynamic Optimization Algorithms (EDOAs) have been developed to address these challenges by adapting to changing environments over time. However, the reproducibility and consistency of experimental results in the literature remain limited due to the lack of publicly available source codes and the complexity of accurately re-implementing algorithms and performance evaluation protocols. To support the community, we introduce E volutionary D ynamic O ptimization LAB oratory (EDOLAB), an open source MATLAB platform designed for both research and educational purposes. EDOLAB includes 27 EDOAs, four highly configurable benchmark generators, and a growing suite of performance indicators. The platform supports full parameter tuning, batch experiment management, parallel execution, and automated statistical comparisons—including rankings, significance testing, box plots, and performance trend visualizations over time. An educational application allows users to observe: (a) dynamic changes in a 2D problem landscape, (b) the movement of individuals in response to these changes, and (c) the ability of an algorithm to track moving optima. By providing an integrated environment for experimentation, benchmarking, and instructional use, EDOLAB promotes reproducibility, comparative analysis, and a deeper understanding of EDOAs in dynamic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it