Beyond Bhe – Examining the Impact of Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha on the Customary Law of Succession and Gender Equality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In societies where customary law interacts with Western legal principles, cultural conflicts show how deeply law and society affect each other. They reveal how social beliefs and practices shape legal rules and how those rules, in turn, shape how people behave and how society is organised. This tension complicates efforts to harmonise legal frameworks across Africa, with South Africa standing as a poignant example. The impact of Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha, Shibi v Sithole, South African Human Rights Commission v President of the Republic of South Africa (2005 1 SA 580 ( CC ) twenty years later, reveals an ongoing challenge where customary law rules of succession have been weakened by the dominant application of Western values inherited from colonial and apartheid-era legal systems in addressing customary law issues. This has disrupted the delicate balance between cultural rights and gender equality, particularly for women governed by customary law. This article challenges the prevailing narrative, arguing that instead of portraying customary succession laws as inherently unequal, patriarchal, and restrictive, as seen in Bhe, the courts and legislature should have reformed these laws through customary institutions and mechanisms to align with the Constitution. Relying on Western understandings of legal concepts of equality alone fails to recognise that culture and equality can coexist without one being sacrificed for the other. A more nuanced approach is needed, acknowledging their interrelationship within the constitutional framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".