Synthesis, Anthelmintic Activity, and Mechanism of Action of 5-Aryl-1 <i>H</i> -indoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Parasitic nematodes are a significant concern in human and veterinary medicine as well as agriculture. In this study, we prepared twenty-seven 5-phenyl-1 H -indole derivatives bearing various substituents on the phenyl ring and assessed their efficacy against nematodes. Using Caenorhabditis elegans, we selected the most potent compounds and evaluated their toxicity on selected animal and plant-parasitic nematode species. Compounds featuring 4-chloro, 4-fluoro, and 4-trifluoromethoxy groups on the phenyl ring inhibited the motility of exsheathed L3 larvae of Hemonchus contortus while exhibiting limited cytotoxicity in mammalian cell cultures. These compounds showed similar effects against the plant-parasitic nematodes Heterodera schachtii and Ditylenchus destructor, albeit with reduced potency. We propose that the compounds might act as inhibitors of mitochondrial complex II as inferred from molecular modeling, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, and reduced activity in C. elegans complex II mutants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".