MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417406681 · doi:10.1525/elementa.2024.00051

Sensing the Ocean through the Exquisite Corpse ArtScience method

2025· article· en· W4417406681 on OpenAlexafffund
Julia Jung, Aleksandra Cherkasheva, Charlotte Corporeau, Jayalaxshmi Mistry, Diego Narvaez, Alison Neilson, Dwight Owens, Camille Parrain, David J. Riddell, Anna Zivian

Bibliographic record

VenueElementa Science of the Anthropocene · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsOcean Networks Canada SocietyUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaEuropean CommissionGovernment of CanadaHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeCanarie
KeywordsMainstreamCitizen journalismParticipatory action researchAction (physics)Process (computing)Climate justiceCommonsEquity (law)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current interconnected crises of climate breakdown, biodiversity loss, and lack of justice and equity suggest that existing mainstream actions are inadequate and that different approaches are needed. Using a participatory action research approach, we aimed to demonstrate the potential of the asynchronous group-based “Exquisite Corpse” art process to catalyze meaningful relationships within an interdisciplinary group of ocean ArtScience practitioners. We conducted two action cycles and iterations of this process and a final action cycle of collective meaning-making. The first iteration took place in Fall 2021 with 7 participants focused on the topic of “ocean hypoxia”; the second focused on “extreme ocean events” with 10 participants in Spring 2022. The third action cycle in Spring 2023 resulted in the themes of “curiosity and connecting with people in a safe(r) space,” “semi-ambiguous seed as a catalyst,” “space for experimentation and creation,” “sharing findings and experiences,” “collective creation of connected artworks,” “finding commons and common ground(s),” “giving, receiving and opening,” “developing relationships,” and “boundaries navigating fluidity.” These themes describe the benefits that can arise from the Exquisite Corpse process on both individual and community levels of practice that could be extrapolated more widely and illustrate the potential contributions of ocean ArtScience on a systemic level. On an individual level, participants gained new scientific, artistic or personal insights, expanded their practices and deeply connected with other participants. At the community level, we argue that participatory exercises like the Exquisite Corpse process can increase relational trust, generating community-wide benefits. Additionally, activating pluralistic perspectives can help communities create more welcoming spaces for diverse participants. These emerging relationships have strengthened this budding community of practice, with further projects and opportunities growing from the endeavor. Our project also highlights how ArtScience approaches can help meet the challenges of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElementa Science of the AnthropoceneSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207