La inteligibilidad de la palabra hablada en los salones del Aulario José Luis Massera de la UDELAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar los resultados del ensayo de inteligibilidad de la palabra hablada en cuatro salones del Edificio Polifuncional José Luis Massera de la Universidad de la República. La elección de los salones se basa en un estudio anterior donde se obtuvieron los valores de ruido de fondo, tiempos de reverberación y a partir de estos datos se calcularon las curvas NR y los valores de SIL. Con esos datos iniciales se plantea, para los salones más comprometidos en esos valores, el ensayo de inteligibilidad de la palabra hablada a fin de completar su caracterización acústica. Con ese punto de partida se realizan los ensayos, cumpliendo la normativa vigente. A partir de la misma se analizan los resultados a fin de determinar las condiciones de audición de estos locales. De esta forma podremos comprobar si el mensaje está llegando correctamente a los estudiantes que escuchan la clase y determinar si es posible, en las condiciones actuales, el uso de estos salones sin amplificación.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".