MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417426983 · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106300

Radiographic bone changes following non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4417426983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tina Lipovec, Mira Shah, Zainab Malaki, B. F. A. Karim, Luigi Nibali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dentistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiographyDental alveolusAlveolar processBone densityPeriodontal disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate radiographic alveolar bone changes following non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT). DATA: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024564043). The Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool for randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised trials. Funnel plots were utilised to identify publication bias, and the level of certainty was evaluated using the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. SOURCES: Electronic (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, VHL, Scopus) and manual searches. STUDY SELECTION: Studies published until 16 July 2024, reporting on radiographic changes after NSPT delivery with a follow-up duration of at least 6 months. RESULTS: 46 citations were included in the review. Single-arm meta-analysis evaluated infrabony defect depth reduction (DDR), defect fill (DF), defect angle fill (DAF), and horizontal bone loss (HBL). In non-minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (non-MINST) studies (22 studies, 631 subjects), infrabony DDR reached 0.18 mm and 0.13 mm, with DF ranging from 3.44 % to 2.70 % at 6 and 9-12 months, respectively. Class II furcation defects (5 studies, 144 subjects) exhibited DDR of 0.11-0.16 mm and DF of 2.87-3.44 % at respective time points. The lack of studies focusing on suprabony defects in non-MINST studies prevented their synthesis. MINST studies (4 studies, 144 subjects) presented more clinically significant improvements with effect increasing over 6-24 months: total DDR 1.48 mm, vertical DDR 1.64 mm, DF 29.17 %, DAF +7.03° High heterogeneity, high to unclear RoB, and low certainty of evidence were detected. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistency, though heterogeneity remained high. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that NSPT may reduce radiographic defect depths, with MINST exhibiting more clinically significant results. Long-term, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and inform clinical protocols. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review suggests that non-surgical approaches can lead to measurable radiographic changes, indicating their potential to stimulate alveolar bone regeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of DentistrySame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207