MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417430985 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70598

Increased posterior tibial slope in patients with anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knees compared to knees with an intact anterior cruciate ligament and a degenerative medial meniscus tear: A radiographic comparative study

2025· article· en· W4417430985 on OpenAlexaff
Shintaro Onishi, Christophe Jacquet, Hiroshi Nakayama, Faisal AlFayyadh, Alexander J Hoffer, Matthieu Ollivier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedial meniscusAnterior cruciate ligamentRadiographyOrthopedic surgeryRetrospective cohort studyOsteoarthritisMeniscus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to quantify the difference in posterior tibial slope (PTS) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency compared to those with a degenerative medial meniscus posterior horn tear (dMMPHT). We hypothesised that patients with ACL deficiency would have a greater PTS compared to patients with dMMPHT. Methods All consecutive patients diagnosed with ACL deficiency (ACL group) or a dMMPHT with an intact ACL (MM group) from 2016 to 2022 at a single centre were reviewed. PTS was measured using the medial tibial plateau and tibial mechanical axis on standard lateral knee radiographs. Linear regression analysis was completed to assess the correlation between PTS and age in both groups. Further sub‐group analysis was undertaken according to age and sex of the study population. Results In total, 294 patients in the ACL group and 250 patients in the MM group were analysed. Age differed between the groups (ACL group: 29.5 ± 10.4 years vs. MM group: 38.7 ± 8.5 years, p < 0.001). Radiological evaluation demonstrated increased mean PTS in the ACL group compared to the MM group (10.1° ± 3.0 vs. 6.7° ± 2.6, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the PTS and age in each group. When patients were subdivided into those younger than 30 years of age and those 30 years or older, there was no significant difference in the PTS in the ACL group. In contrast, younger patients had a steeper PTS compared to those 30 years or older in the MM group (7.5° ± 1.9 vs. 6.5° ± 2.7, p = 0.005). Conclusions Patients with an ACL tear had a significantly higher PTS on standard lateral knee radiographs compared to those with dMMPHTs and a normal ACL. Elevated PTS may be a risk factor for ACL rupture. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental OrthopaedicsSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207