MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417431821 · doi:10.3390/cancers17244022

Insomnia in Women Surviving Breast and Gynecological Cancers—A Narrative Review to Address the Hormonal Factor

2025· article· en· W4417431821 on OpenAlexaff
Silvia Martella, Paola Proserpio, Maria Elena Guerrieri, Andrea Galbiati, Luigi Ferini‐Strambi, Laura Cucinella, Anna Daniela Iacobone, D. Franchi, Rossella E. Nappi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
FundersMinistero della Salute
KeywordsBreast cancerMoodInsomniaPopulationSleep disorderMood disordersCancerQuality of life (healthcare)Vasomotor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female cancers, including breast and gynecological malignancies, are among the most prevalent oncological conditions worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment have markedly improved survival, resulting in a growing population of female cancer survivors. Consequently, long-term health and quality of life have become essential aspects of comprehensive cancer care. Among survivorship issues, sleep disturbances-particularly insomnia-are highly prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes including mood and cognitive impairment, fatigue, immune and cardiometabolic dysregulation, and reduced adherence to therapy. Insomnia, defined as difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep or experiencing poor sleep quality with daytime impairment, affects 6-10% of the general population and is more common in women. In cancer survivors, poor sleep quality appears to be three times more frequent, reaching 62% in breast cancer survivors, although these data may be underestimated, especially for other cancer types, due to the small sample size and heterogeneity of the studies. The pathogenesis of insomnia in female cancer patients is multifactorial, involving cancer-related inflammation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation, neuroimmune alterations, treatment effects, psychological distress, and behavioral factors. Hormonal disruption plays a central role, as oncological treatments are often the cause of iatrogenic menopause, leading to vasomotor symptoms, mood and cognitive disturbances, sexual dysfunction, and genitourinary complaints, all contributing to sleep disruption. Importantly, estrogens and progesterone independently regulate sleep-wake pathways via central mechanisms, influencing sleep quality even in the absence of vasomotor symptoms. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating oncology, gynecology, and sleep medicine. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is first-line, while pharmacologic options include benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, SSRIs/SNRIs, melatonin, or new medication like DORAs. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) should be considered for premature menopause management in selected women without contraindications, improving both vasomotor symptoms and sleep quality. Emerging neurokinin receptor (NK-R) antagonists show promise, and ongoing trials suggest significant potential even in breast cancer survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancersSame topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207