MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417432840 · doi:10.1002/cph4.70083

Advantage of Semaglutide: Comprehensive Analysis of Metabolic Impact of Semaglutide‐Treated and Pair‐Fed Rats

2025· article· en· W4417432840 on OpenAlex
Morgan Sotzen, Mya A. Knappenberger, Madison T. Bento, Mohammed Asker, Doris I. Olekanma, Karolina P. Skibicka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAdipose tissueWhite adipose tissueObesityHypophagiaAdipocyteHormoneBody weightWeight lossThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semaglutide (SEMA), a GLP-1 receptor agonist, effectively reduces body weight. Yet its mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood. It is unclear whether SEMA promotes weight loss solely through reduced food intake or also through intake-independent mechanisms, and whether these effects differ by sex. To address these questions, we used a pair-feeding design in diet-induced obese rats, comparing SEMA-treated rats with both ad libitum-fed controls and SEMA intake-matched groups over 4-week treatment. Analyses included sex-stratified outcomes, depot-specific brown and white adipose profiling, thermogenesis, locomotor activity, and circulating metabolic hormone measurements. SEMA reduced food intake of both hypercaloric, high-fat/high-sugar diet and chow and produced body weight loss beyond the effects of caloric restriction alone. SEMA also curbed the hunger hormone ghrelin. It reduced visceral adiposity and increased activity, albeit more potently in females compared to males. Across adipose depots SEMA promoted smaller adipocyte size, white adipose tissue browning, and enhanced sympathetic innervation, while these changes were largely absent in pair-fed rats. SEMA rescued caloric restriction-associated hypothermia and small reductions in circulating thyroid hormones; it also potentiated local thyroid input. SEMA induced sex-dependent, depot-specific adipose remodeling and sustained increases in locomotor activity independent of food intake. Our integrative approach provides new insight into SEMA's mechanisms and highlights the importance of evaluating sex as a biological variable in mechanistic studies of obesity therapies. Metabolic benefits of the SEMA treatment far outweighed those offered by comparable caloric restriction, indicating that its mechanism of action involves not only hypophagia but also adipose tissue remodeling and browning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it