MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417433740 · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.70226

Thresholding species distribution models: Simple approaches for land‐use planning in multifunctional landscapes

2025· article· en· W4417433740 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hossam E. Abdel Moniem, Chris Mallon, Brandon E. Allen, Carter J. Littlefair, Lionel Leston, Ermias T. Azeria, Aaron M. Petty, Danielle Pendlebury

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Ecology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring InstituteUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Environment and Protected Areas
FundersAlberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute
KeywordsThresholdingHabitatRelative species abundanceAbundance (ecology)Species distributionGeneralist and specialist speciesProxy (statistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Species distribution models (SDMs) are often used to understand changes to species' distributions and their habitats under different land‐use scenarios, enabling decision makers to prioritize areas for management efforts and balance environmental conservation with socio‐economic demands on the landscape. However, the application of SDMs in land‐use planning and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) remains limited due to challenges in interpreting and communicating continuous predictions resulting from these SDMs. Although different binarization methods have been used to overcome such challenges, the choice of threshold can profoundly alter the resulting binary habitat map, and most methods lack simplicity and require access to underlying species occurrence and environmental data used to develop the SDMs. Hence, there is a demand for testing simple alternative binarization methods to enable in‐house application of SDMs by practitioners and to facilitate interpretation and communication. Using SDMs of 103 boreal bird species in Alberta, Canada, we transform species relative abundance predictions of SDMs into direct estimates of habitat area, a proxy for habitat suitability, using four simple and three complex thresholding methods. We compare the performance of the binarized models for each bird species and between forest specialists vs. generalists under land‐use change scenarios. We found that thresholded models reflect losses in suitable habitat under industrial disturbance scenarios more realistically compared to continuous relative abundance models. Notably, simple thresholding methods, particularly the mean predicted relative abundance, performed similarly to complex thresholding methods in predicting suitable habitat areas, as indicated by model evaluations using the area under the curve. These findings suggest that using the mean as a binarization threshold can effectively bridge the gap between complex SDMs and their application in policy and planning, without sacrificing predictive accuracy. We conclude that simple threshold binarization methods, such as the mean, can leverage the strong predictive power of SDMs to provide insights into future changes in species' habitat during land‐use planning scenarios, account for their uncertainties and expand their utility to facilitate interpretation for science‐informed decision‐making in multifunctional landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in Ecology and EvolutionSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207