Valacyclovir Treatment of Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Neuroscientific, epidemiological, and electronic health record studies implicate herpes simplex virus (HSV) as potentially etiological for Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of valacyclovir vs placebo in participants with early symptomatic AD and HSV seropositivity (HSV-1 or HSV-2). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included adults with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD or a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment with positive biomarkers for AD, a positive serum antibody test (IgG or IgM) for HSV-1 or HSV-2, and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 18 to 28. The trial was conducted at 3 US outpatient clinics specializing in memory disorders. Recruitment occurred from January 2018 to May 2022; the last follow-up occurred in September 2024. Intervention: Either 4 g/d of valacyclovir (n = 60) or matching placebo (n = 60). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was least-squares mean (LSM) change at 78 weeks in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive (ADAS-Cognitive) Subscale score (range, 0-70; higher scores indicate greater impairment). The secondary outcomes were LSM change in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scale score; LSM change in the 18F-florbetapir amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR; higher scores indicate higher amyloid levels) for 6 brain regions (medial orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate, parietal lobe, posterior cingulate, temporal lobe, and precuneus); and LSM change in 18F-MK-6240 tau PET medial temporal SUVR (higher scores indicate higher tau levels) for 4 brain regions (amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal, and parahippocampus). The frequency of adverse events was the safety outcome. Results: Of the 120 participants (mean age, 71.4 [SD, 8.6] years; 55% were female), 93 (77.5%) completed the trial. At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 11-item ADAS-Cognitive Subscale score was 10.86 (95% CI, 8.80 to 12.91) in the valacyclovir group vs 6.92 (95% CI, 4.88 to 8.97) in the placebo group, indicating greater cognitive worsening with valacyclovir than placebo (between-group difference, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.03 to 6.83]; P = .01). The LSM change in the ADCS-ADL Scale score at 78 weeks was -13.78 (95% CI, -17.00 to -10.56) in the valacyclovir group vs -10.16 (95% CI, -13.37 to -6.96) in the placebo group (between-group difference, -3.62 [95% CI, -8.16 to 0.93]). At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 18F-florbetapir amyloid PET SUVR was 0.03 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.10) in the valacyclovir group vs 0.01 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.08) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.12]). The LSM change in the 18F-MK-6240 tau PET medial temporal SUVR at 78 weeks was 0.07 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.19) in the valacyclovir group vs -0.04 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.07) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.11 [95% CI, -0.06 to 0.28]). The most common adverse events were elevated serum creatinine level (5 participants [8.3%] in the valacyclovir group vs 2 participants [3.3%] in the placebo group) and COVID-19 infection (3 [5%] vs 2 [3.3%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Valacyclovir was not efficacious with cognitive worsening for the primary outcome and it is not recommended to treat individuals with early symptomatic AD and HSV seropositivity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03282916.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".