MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417439095 · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2500259

Toward a Secure Zero-Touch Tactile Internet: Challenges and Opportunities

2025· article· W4417439095 on OpenAlexaff
Zakaria Abou El Houda, Hajar Moudoud

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Reliability (semiconductor)Security serviceThe InternetService (business)Security managementCloud computing security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tactile Internet (TI) is a new generation of communication networks, extending beyond 5G/6G capabilities to achieve ultra-low latency, ultra-responsive, ultra-high availability, and ultra-high reliability communication services and thus enabling a new era of real-time applications, such as virtual reality, remote surgery, and autonomous driving. TI is expected to revolutionize many industries, including healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing. Despite recent TI initiatives, security aspects remain largely unexplored. TI presents several security challenges due to the increased complexity of the network and the criticality of the applications it supports. Thus, security aspects must be carefully designed to ensure that the benefits of the TI are not outweighed by the risks. In this article, we will initially identify the leading factors that drive TI, with regard to their applications and related technological trends, with respect to ETSI's Zero-touch Service Management (ZSM) principles. Then, we shed light on the primary security challenges, the current missing building blocks toward secure TI, and propose some potential solutions. Finally, we conclude the article with several recommendations and observations for the roadmap toward secure TI. Ultimately, the focus of this article is to establish a foundation for more in-depth research on TI security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications MagazineSame topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207