MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417455866 · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14121284

Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Pediatric UTIs: A Review of the Literature and Selected Experimental Observations

2025· article· en· W4417455866 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Tamas, Erlinda R. Ulloa, Monika Kumaraswamy, Samira Dahesh, Raymond Zurich, Victor Nizet, Alison Coady

Bibliographic record

VenueAntibiotics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsCathelicidinAntibioticsVirulenceIn vivoImmune systemAntimicrobialEscherichia coliBiofilm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(UPEC). An increasing proportion of these strains produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which render β-lactam antibiotics ineffective. Interestingly, some patients with ESBL-producing UTIs improve clinically following treatment with antibiotics like cephalexin, despite demonstrated in vitro resistance. Working alongside and at times synergistically with antibiotics, host immune factors, such as the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin (LL-37), contribute to bacterial clearance through direct killing and inhibition of biofilm formation. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of pediatric ESBL-producing UPEC infections and present selected in vitro and in vivo experimental data evaluating the combined effects of LL-37 and cephalexin on clinical isolates. Although no synergy was observed, ESBL-producing isolates demonstrated reduced bacterial burden in vivo compared to a non-ESBL UPEC strain. These findings suggest that host immune factors and environmental conditions may influence the fitness and virulence of drug-resistant UTI pathogens, warranting further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntibioticsSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207