Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Pediatric UTIs: A Review of the Literature and Selected Experimental Observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(UPEC). An increasing proportion of these strains produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), which render β-lactam antibiotics ineffective. Interestingly, some patients with ESBL-producing UTIs improve clinically following treatment with antibiotics like cephalexin, despite demonstrated in vitro resistance. Working alongside and at times synergistically with antibiotics, host immune factors, such as the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin (LL-37), contribute to bacterial clearance through direct killing and inhibition of biofilm formation. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of pediatric ESBL-producing UPEC infections and present selected in vitro and in vivo experimental data evaluating the combined effects of LL-37 and cephalexin on clinical isolates. Although no synergy was observed, ESBL-producing isolates demonstrated reduced bacterial burden in vivo compared to a non-ESBL UPEC strain. These findings suggest that host immune factors and environmental conditions may influence the fitness and virulence of drug-resistant UTI pathogens, warranting further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".