Global Ensemble Fire Emission Product Version 1.0 (EnsemFire V1.0)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents EnsemFire v1.0, a global ensemble fire emission dataset that provides daily emissions at 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution for key air pollutants like fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), carbon monoxide (CO), ammonia (NH₃), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), and sulfur dioxide (SO₂), greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄), and fire radiative power (FRP). EnsemFire integrates seven widely used biomass burning emission inventories, including five global datasets (GFAS, FINN, FEER, QFED, GBBEPx) and two regional products (EPA and CFFEPS). Our analysis reveals noticeable inconsistencies among these datasets, reflecting the large uncertainty in biomass burning emission estimates. By applying an ensemble approach, EnsemFire reduces this uncertainty and provides a more robust emission estimate. When used as input to the Unified Forecast System (UFS) model, EnsemFire significantly reduces simulation bias and improves the model performance to predict aerosol optical depth (AOD) compared to the control run that uses the default emission input. This dataset offers a valuable resource for atmospheric modeling, air quality forecasting, and climate research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".