MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417457468 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.00424

Bezeotermin Alfa (rhBMP-6) Administration in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Using a Posterior Approach

2025· article· en· W4417457468 on OpenAlexaff
Weishi Li, Xiaoji Luo, Xiaozhong Zhou, Bo Liu, Huilin Yang, Liangbin Gao, Juan Ke, Wanling Liang, Zhongzhou Xiao, Yidan Zhang, Hua Zhu Ke, Slobodan Vukičević, Y.Q. Zhang, Markian Pahuta, Ricardo E. Dent-Acosta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLumbarAdministration (probate law)PercutaneousComplicationClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Novel osteoconductive and osteoinductive therapies for posterior-based lumbar interbody fusion surgery are needed. Bezeotermin alfa (recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein [rhBMP]-6, previously referred to as AGA111) is a potential potent stimulator of bone regeneration. This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled Phase-2 trial evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of bezeotermin carried by autologous blood coagulum (ABC) in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion surgery between L3 and S1 for degenerative disc disease. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for single-level elective lumbar interbody fusion surgery across 6 clinical trial sites in the People's Republic of China were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, 0.25 mg bezeotermin, or 0.5 mg bezeotermin and followed for 12 months. The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Secondary end points included anti-rhBMP-6 antibodies, the success rate of radiographic fusion, changes in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, changes in the pain score on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and serum drug concentrations. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with a mean age of 59.2 years (52% female, 98.4% Han) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one, 20, and 22 of the patients were randomized to placebo, 0.25 mg bezeotermin, and 0.5 mg bezeotermin, respectively. All patients reported at least 1 AE during the study, but most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. No drug-related serious AEs were reported in the bezeotermin groups. There was a trend toward a higher rate of successful radiographic fusion and greater improvement of the ODI and VAS scores in the bezeotermin groups than in the placebo group from month 3 to month 12. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that bezeotermin/ABC was safe and well tolerated during posterior-based single-level lumbar interbody fusion. The preliminary efficacy of bezeotermin in accelerating spinal fusion and improving clinical outcomes supports its further clinical development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery→Same topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology→French-language works237,207→