Reassessing the Path to 2075: A Long-Term Economic Projection Excluding Exchange-Rate Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper re-examines Goldman Sachs’ The Path to 2075 – Slower Global Growth, but Convergence Remains Intact (2022) by isolating the long-term projections of global gross domestic product (GDP) from the effects of projected real-exchange-rate adjustments. Using the original econometric framework – comprising demographic, productivity, and investment dynamics – this study reconstructs 2075 GDP estimates under a constant real-exchange-rate scenario, effectively removing the Balassa–Samuelson convergence mechanism that underpins emerging-market currency appreciation. The recalculated outcomes demonstrate significant ranking shifts: the United States becomes the world’s largest economy, China follows in second place, and India remains third, while the rapid ascent of Nigeria, Pakistan, and Egypt is notably curtailed. The analysis reveals that currency appreciation functions as a powerful amplifier of nominal convergence, accounting for between 10 and 20 per cent of the emerging-market growth premium in Goldman Sachs’ baseline. By comparing exchange-rate-neutral projections with the institution’s published forecasts, the research shows how valuation effects can distort perceptions of long-run global balance. A comparative table and ranking-shift figure illustrate how removing exchange-rate assumptions rebalances the projected hierarchy of the world’s largest economies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".