MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417461702 · doi:10.3354/meps15082

Within-individual behaviour of razorbills Alca torda during the non-breeding season is consistent but not related to personality

2025· article· en· W4417461702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew J. Legard, Antony W. Diamond, David A. Fifield, Heather L. Major, Robert A. Ronconi, Gail K. Davoren

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdSeasonal breederNesting seasonForaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within-individual consistency and between-individual variation in migratory and foraging behaviour have been observed in many species, including seabirds. Migratory differences among individuals within species have been linked to factors such as age, sex and animal personality, and may have fitness consequences. Therefore, we aimed to investigate individual consistency in distribution (i.e. location, distance from colony), foraging dive depth and dietary metrics for razorbills Alca torda during non-breeding seasons across years and whether these behaviours were related to a personality trait. Between 2017 and 2023, we deployed light-level geolocator (global location sensor, GLS) and combination geolocator temperature-depth recorder (GLS/TDR) tags on personality-tested razorbills (docile-aggressive continuum) during chick-rearing in coastal Newfoundland, Canada, and collected feathers (head, belly, secondary) to quantify stable isotope ratios of nitrogen (δ 15 N) as a proxy of trophic level. Razorbills displayed high repeatability ( R ) in their non-breeding locations and the distances travelled north ( R = 0.592) and south ( R = 0.564) from the colony. Razorbills also displayed low but significant repeatability in dive depth ( R = 0.133) and δ 15 N values ( R = 0.128). However, these metrics were not related to docility. Overall, the small but consistent differences in non-breeding location and foraging behaviour among individuals suggest that environmental conditions causing negative fitness consequences may be experienced by certain subsets of the population, thereby minimising the impacts of localised threats at the population-level. Although relationships between our measured personality trait (docility) and non-breeding behaviours were not observed, we suggest future studies investigate personality to understand the between-individual variation shown in a growing number of studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207