MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417464066 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13803

Data and code for "Freeness Reined in by a Single Qubit"

2025· preprint· W4417464066 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Altland, Francisco Divi, Tobias Micklitz, Maedeh Rezaei

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsQubitObservableRobustness (evolution)Python (programming language)QuantumCode (set theory)Dimension (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Free probability provides a framework for describing correlations between non-commuting observables in complex quantum systems whose Hilbert-space states follow maximum-entropy distributions. We examine the robustness of this framework under a minimal deviation from freeness: the coupling of a single ancilla qubit to a Haar-distributed quantum circuit of dimension $D_0\gg 1$. We find that, even in this setting, the correlation functions predicted by free probability theory receive corrections of order $O(1)$. These modifications persist at long times, when the dynamics of the coupled system is already ergodic. We trace their origin to non-uniformly distributed stationary quantum states, which we characterize analytically and confirm numerically. Data and code for Freeness Reined in by a Single Qubit Here, we provide the numerical code and precomputed Monte-Carlo data used to reproduce the spectral form factor (SFF) and two-point correlation function (CBA) figures in the companion manuscript "Freeness Reined in by a Single Qubit." The repository includes Precomputed Monte-Carlo data Spectral form factor data: estimates of $\overline{|⟨U^t⟩|²}$ for discrete times $t = 1,\dots,300$. Two-point correlator ("CBA") data: values of $\overline{⟨A B(t)⟩}$ stored as a complex array (the plots use the real part). Results are provided for multiple ancilla-environment coupling strengths $g \in \{0.5,\,0.6,\,0.8,\,1.0\}$, internally mapped to the rate $\gamma = g^{2}/2$. Default model size: an environment register of $6$ qubits plus one ancilla qubit, yielding a total Hilbert-space dimension $D = 128$. The numerics are performed using Python code included in the repository. A Jupyter notebook loads the data and reproduces all plots in publication-ready form. Files 01\_sff\_cba.py: Monte-Carlo simulation script (generates Data/*.pkl) 02\_plots.ipynb: plotting notebook (loads Data/*.pkl and generates figures) Data/: precomputed dataset sff\_cba\_multi\_g\_env6\_samples1000000.pkl Results/: output figures produced by the notebook: SFF\_multig\_env6\_samples1000000.(pdf|png) CBA\_env6\_samples1000000.(pdf|png) The Jupyter notebook automatically loads the data stored in the folder Data/ and writes the resulting figures to Results/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207