MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417465939 · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2025.12.007

Role of Radiographic Fibrosis Extent in Identifying Immunomodulatory Treatment Response in Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

2025· article· en· W4417465939 on OpenAlexaff
CAROLINE MUEGGE, Bohyung Min, A. Mrad, Emily Ianazzo, Sahil Pandya, Gregory Lee, Melissa Carroll, Kerri A. Johannson, Scott M. Matson

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthPulmonary Fibrosis FoundationNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAmerican Lung Association
KeywordsFibrosisHypersensitivity pneumonitisPulmonary fibrosisRadiographyPulmonary function testingClinical trialLung fibrosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Treatment selection in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) remains empiric because of a lack of randomized trial data. Although radiographic fibrosis extent often is used to inform treatment decisions, its usefulness as a theragnostic marker for immunomodulatory therapy is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is visual fibrosis extent on high-resolution CT (HRCT) imaging associated with differential pulmonary function response to immunomodulation in chronic HP? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 108 patients with HP from 2 interstitial lung disease (ILD) referral centers who received ≥ 3 months of immunomodulatory therapy (prednisone, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab) and had undergone pulmonary function testing and HRCT imaging before and after treatment. Fibrosis extent was classified as ≥ 10% or < 10% based on masked radiologist reads. Linear spline mixed-effects models were used to estimate FVC and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco) % predicted trajectory before and after immunomodulation, with patients serving as their own controls. The primary analysis evaluated whether fibrosis extent modified the association between immunomodulation and lung function trajectory. RESULTS: Overall, immunomodulation was associated with a modest FVC improvement at 12 months (+2.63%; 95% CI, 0.72-4.54; P < .01). Among patients with < 10% fibrosis, immunomodulation was associated with improvements in both FVC (+5.83%; P < .01) and Dlco (+13.9%; P < .01). In contrast, no improvement in FVC (+0.81%; P = .42) or Dlco (-4.3%; P = .17) was observed in patients with ≥ 10% fibrosis at 12 months. Baseline demographics, smoking history, and antigen identification status were similar between fibrosis groups. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study indicate that visual fibrosis extent is associated with differential pulmonary function response to immunomodulatory therapy in chronic HP. Patients with limited fibrosis demonstrated improved pulmonary function compared with those with greater radiographic fibrosis. These findings may support the use of fibrosis extent as a clinical tool for treatment stratification and highlight the need for prospective trials to validate radiographic markers in guiding HP management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEST Journal→Same topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis→French-language works237,207→