MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417467166 · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.186004

Quantitative V gene–targeted T cell receptor sequencing as a biomarker in type 1 diabetes

2025· article· en· W4417467166 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Laurie G. Landry, Kristen L. Wells, A. Anderson, Kristen Miller, Kenneth L. Jones, Aaron W. Michels, Maki Nakayama

Bibliographic record

VenueJCI Insight · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesUniversity of AlbertaLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
KeywordsT-cell receptorBiomarkerT cellNodNOD miceType 1 diabetesReceptorAutoimmune disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing biomarkers to quantitatively monitor disease-specific T cell activity is crucial for assessing type 1 diabetes (T1D) progression and evaluating immunotherapies. This study presents an approach using V gene-targeted sequencing to quantify T cell receptor (TCR) clonotypes as biomarkers for pathogenic T cells in T1D. We identified "public" TCR clonotypes shared among multiple nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice and human organ donors, with a subset expressed exclusively by islet-antigen-reactive T cells in those with T1D. Employing V gene-targeted sequencing of only TCRs containing TRAV16/16D allowed quantitative detection of the public islet-antigen-reactive TCR clonotypes in peripheral blood of NOD mice. Frequencies of these public TCR clonotypes distinguished prediabetic NOD mice from those protected from diabetes. In human islets, public TCR clonotypes identical to preproinsulin-specific clones were exclusively found in T1D donors. This quantifiable TCR sequencing approach uncovered public, disease-specific clonotypes in T1D, providing biomarker candidates to monitor pathogenic T cell frequencies in blood for assessing disease activity and therapeutic response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCI InsightSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207