MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy of xanomeline and xanomeline trospium in the treatment of cognitive impairment: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials

2025· review· en· W4417467813 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Valentino, Bing-gui Shen, Bethany Waisman, Gia Han Le, Hana Ballum, William W. L. Cheung, Roger S. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrain and Cognition Discovery Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialCognitionSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Muscarinic agonistAntipsychoticSystematic review

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high prevalence, persistence and clinical burden of cognitive impairment on health outcomes in persons with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder invites the need for innovative, mechanistically informed pharmacotherapeutic interventions. Evidence implicates dysregulation of muscarinic signalling as a mediator of cognitive dysfunction, identifying it as a potential therapeutic target. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Databases were searched from inception to May 1, 2025. Study screening and selection was performed by three reviewers (K.V., B.S., and B.W.). Included studies reported on the effects of xanomeline and/or xanomeline trospium on cognitive function. A total of 24 studies were included in this review. Preclinical and clinical studies consistently demonstrate that xanomeline trospium is well tolerated in both short and long-term evaluations. Furthermore, xanomeline trospium has been associated with cognitive improvements in both animal models and clinical populations (e.g., Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia), including improvements in verbal learning, delayed memory, and reaction time. Xanomeline trospium, an FDA approved muscarinic M1/M4 partial agonist with demonstrated safety, tolerability, and efficacy, represents a novel pharmacological intervention for the treatment of schizophrenia. The convergence of preclinical and clinical findings supports the hypothesis that xanomeline trospium exerts direct pro cognitive effects in persons with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and potentially other neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g., AD). Limitations of the current study include limited indications investigated and the absence of a comprehensive analysis of xanomeline's overall neurobiologic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.008
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207